“James is the author of the dissident plays THE CRUCIBLE and SOYLENT GREEN AND GOLD (amongst others). His latest projects (Books and Documentary Films “SOLVING DEBTOCRACY – GETTING THE WORLD BACK ON THE PATH TO DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE RULE OF LAW” and “LAWYEROCRACY - HOW LAWYER ELITES HIJACKED OUR GOVERNMENT” will be released in 2012.”
BEc (Hons) LLB. Journalist. Whistleblower. Documentary Film Maker. Constitutional Human Rights Lawyer & Independent Federal Candidate for Lalor (Commonwealth of Australia). Defending Families and Civil & Political Rights and Freedoms. Advocating Smaller, Open Governments with Lower Taxes and Smaller, Better, Faster Bureaucracy. Also Advocating Justice & Politics Reforms.
JAMES’ STORY
James is a prominent Australian constitutional lawyer, human rights campaigner, innovative thinker and whistleblower, noted for powerful oratory and written skills, which he puts to good use in the law courts, as a media commentator and as an author, playwrite and filmmaker.
Early Years
James graduated from Monash University in 1986 with a Bachelor of Economics (Class IIA Honours) and again in 1989 with a Bachelor of Laws. James was a full time member of the Monash University Faculty of Economics and Politics during the 1987 and 1988 academic years, teaching and relief-lecturing in mainstream undergraduate microeconomics and macroeconomics subjects.
James is the author of more than a hundred published works on topics as diverse as economics, politics, Australian and world history, law, civil liberties and human rights. From late 1998 until mid 2003 James was a monthly columnist for the Victorian Law Institute Journal.
For 12 years, between 1989 and 2001 James enjoyed a successful commercial law career with not one but two of Australia’s most prominent international law firms (both firms consistently ranked in the top 30 law firms in the world).
In 2001 James turned his back on private legal practice to take up General Counsel roles in the government and private sectors, before returning to private practice in 2007.
A Human Rights Tipping Point
James’ career at law has gone down a remarkably similar pathway (corporate law and taxation, to human rights and politics) as other prominent Australian human rights lawyers such as fellow Melbournian Julian Burnside QC, and ex-pat New South Welshman / “New Englander”, Geoffrey Robertson QC.
In 2007 James’ attention was gripped by the schizoid paradox of Australia’s alarmingly prevalent historical and contemporary constitutional human rights falsehoods. Australia is after all a nation that was foundered in 1778 and continued through 1901 federation even up to and beyond 1967, on the twin proto- Hitler “lebensraum” principles of White Supremacy (“White Australia Policy”) and compulsory land grabbing for settlement by genocidal persecution against indigenous inhabitants: See item 5 of James’ Political History of Australia. Leading a sheltered,rarefied existence amongst the lawyer-corporate elites it was not until 2007 that James first became aware of the widespread human rights violations being committed against thousands of ordinary Australians and their families every day, by the Australian Government and a large section the Australian legal profession, under guise of the contemporary degeneration of the Whitlam era’s original simple, “no fault” divorce laws, the Family Law Act 1975.
A Political Calling
On 18 January 2010 (Martin Luther King Day, Public Holiday in the United States of America), James declared himself as an Independent Candidate for the Australian House of Representatives in the “Labor landmark” of his home electorate of Lalor. The current Federal Member for Lalor, Prime Minister Julia Gillard, is an authoritarianism, far-left “Labor Princess” who was implanted into the Lalor electorate by her Australian Labor Party on the 1998 retirement of former quiz-show champion Barry Jones, making Lalor one of the most neglected Federal Electorates in Australia for more than a decade.
In Australia, parliamentarians are not chosen by the people. Parliamentarians are selected by extra-Constitutional organisations called political parties – mostly by the ‘Big 2′ Political Parties – the Australian Labor Party and the Liberal Party of Australia. These political parties have deep, incestuous, connections to the ruling lawyer elite who have for generations before and since federation commanded 99% of all top bureaucratic positions and 100% of all top judicial positions. General elections, and even by-elections, are regularly held in Australia, every few years, at State and Federal levels. At these elections, the people go through the motions of rubber stamping one or other of the political candidates chosen for them by the extra-Constitutional “faceless men and women” as they are quaintly nicknamed in the popular media. Any Australians who “rebel” against the system by refusing to vote are punished by the Government elite, by being fined (in their tens of thousands) and jailed (in their dozens). Not the most democratic or humanitarian or civil-righteous of practices for any Government of the elite to inflict on the ordinary classes of the people.
The ‘Big 2′ political parties are of course to all intents and purposes indistinguishable. Both are filled by parliamentary members and candidates who are 98% from the ruling lawyer political class. A situation that has existing for at least a couple of generations, if not longer. So it makes no real difference, whenever there is a change of Government, which of the ‘Big 2′ political parties has the bigger number of parliamentarians ‘in Government’. And of course, the Australian parliament is notoriously and historically the most feeble of the three branches of government, with so much of the day to day government rule of the people being carried out by the bureaucracy and the judiciary, one could almost say that Australia has in effect dispensed with parliamentary government altogether. Many world and domestic commentators have noted that Australia’s robust Houses of Parliament are internationally notorious, especially the current Australian Federal Parliament, for being little more than gatherings for the propagation of adolescent ribaldry and farce. Parliamentary question time is notorious for being a sick comedy, a manic parody of parliamentary propriety, that does not reflect well on the Australian peoples generally.
The current generation of ruling lawyer class parliamentarians appear (to paraphrase Lewis Carroll’s Adventures in Wonderland) to be “nothing more than a pack of cads”, taxpayer-funded parliamentarians who seem to be fifth-rate, frustrated comic actors and sideshow performers rather than first-rate men and women of genuine passion who genuinely represent the members of the electorates whose interests, at least on paper, they are supposed to advocate and serve.
The Burmese and Ugandan Electoral Practices of the Australian Government
The corrupt electoral practices that James has encountered since January 2010 are just another set of demonstrations of how corrupt and how far from democratic Government Australia really is.
By way of an encore, for the next General Federal Election the Australian Government (via the Australian Electoral Commission) is in the process of redrawing the electoral boundaries, a quantum leap some 40 kilometres southwards:
The Australian Government (via the Australian Electoral Commission) would seem to be economically and politically unstoppable in redrawing Federal Electoral boundaries in any way that its Department power-brokers see fit. This will mean that in 2013, for the first time since Australia’s Federation in 1901, residents of northern suburbs of Geelong and residents of southern suburbs of Geelong will have different Federal Parliamentarians imposed on them (by the bureaucrats and the extra-Constitutional “Big 2” political parties) – both of whom will no doubt continue to not represent their constitutents interests, regardless of which of the two big political parties selected them for the positions.
A Getting of Wisdom – Australia is a Nation of Winstons “Loved” by Big Brother Government
James is appalled by the Orwellian “Big Brother” nature of Government rule in Australia, including the systemic violations of the human rights and dignities of ordinary Australians, especially parents in the family courts who have never before been “in trouble with the lawyers”.
James remains appalled by the evil torment and abuse inflicted on ordinary Australians in these countless secret, closed hearings that resemble Salem witchcraft sessions, a blood sport for “family” lawyers, where all modern concepts of human rights, due process, rule of law and natural justice seem to have been totally suspended by the Australian government. The lives of ordinary Australians are thrown to the merciless whims of all-powerful, un-balanced and un-checked judicial officials, chosen by so-called “family” lawyers from within their own ranks and reflecting their own lawyer class wants and interests rather than the interests, wants, rights and entitlements of ordinary Australians.
Generations of Governing Class Australians (98% of them lawyers) have inflicted all manner of human rights atrocities, beginning with the British economic refuges and Irish political prisoners sent to Australia during the penal era, to the genocides practised against native aboriginals and poor working classes that began during the colonial era. Australia’s “modern” human rights record is plainly visible in our foreign affairs.
Just look at the plight of 100,000 Australia families processed every year by Australia’s corrupted, unconstitutional and killer family courts. This is a system of corruption on an industrial scale, “built-owned-operated’ by and for lawyers, redistributing $40 billion more distressed family wealth plus $10 billion of taxpayers wealth into lawyers pockets with Nazi-like precision. It produces family and society shattering outcomes such as the 12 “Child Support Agency Clients” (political unSpeak for beat dead parents, mostly dads, stripped of parental contact, responsibilities and rights) who, beaten up and abused by Government and lawyers, die every day.100,000 new sets of children enter the Family Court for the first time every year, to become hostages in a bizarre non-humanitarian custody ritual, as lawyers literally tear families apart, while lip-sync’ing the motto “in the best interests of the child”. Most of these children will (like Julian Assange) lose 9 years of their lives (their childhood and/or adolescence) to the Courts of lawyers. Their out-of court life being thrown into poverty and welfare-dependency, one third will lose (by order of the Court) all contact with one of their biological parents (usually the biological father). Family lawyers sowing the seeds of another crop of social and matrimonial failures, the next generation of family law plaintiffs and defendants – a permanent and growing social underclass to sustain the greeds and the needs of the next generation of the 30,000 predatory family lawyers whose own families live very well off the fat of the divorce estates and the taxpayers funds they collect through the Australian family law courts.
“Too many Australian lawyers, world lawyers and world human rights organisations wish to remain or pretend ignorance of these Australian internal affairs human rights atrocities, that are government sanctioned, funded and carried out by and to benefit the ruling lawyer class.”
Being a man of “the humblest of beginnings”, James cannot close his eyes to these outrages. This has earned James the repeated wrath of many powerful figures in the legal and government establishment who continue to seek ways to silence him. These government agents’ and agencies’ criminal reprisals have at various times forced James to live in exile, “with-outlawed” (without legal rights and without protections of the law). James continues to be forced, by corrupt government agents and agencies to protect and todefend himself from a monotonous array of repeated McCarthyist attacks. These coordinated attacks, (which on paper are criminal reprisals against a whistleblower attracting serious jail sentences if the persecutors would only be prosecuted and convicted – by themselves) repeatedly emanate from within a wagon-wheeled circle of a lawyer-run government and para-government organisations – a publicly-funded, lawyer-dominated cartel of rogue, corrupted government agencies and para-government agencies that operate outside of and put themselves beyond the reach of the laws that they supposedly administer and, having long freed themselves from any internal or external government checks or balances, ultimately refuse to comply with themselves, or hold each other accountable to and for their industrial scale violations.
Leading Australia – Towards The Path To Democracy, Human Rights and The Rule of Law
Since 2007 James has acquired a portfolio of involvement in important human rights causes and cases in Australia, defending ordinary Australians from Government abuse in areas such as family rights, child rights, marriage rights, elder rights, indigenous rights, political rights,
Defending other civil and political rights of ordinary Australians (including demands for Government recognition of same sex marriage relationships)
Unlike Government funded (and therefore Government ‘captured’ and ‘controlled’) Australian human rights lawyers and Australian human rights associations that focus their energies on the human rights abuses of marginalised Australians, James focuses his energies (and his private purse) on speaking out for and acting against the far greater volume of Government and Lawyer human rights abuses of ordinary (‘normalised’) Australians.
“James is an outspoken advocate for independent (ie non-lawyer controlled) investigations of sections of the Australian legal profession, the judiciary and legal regulators, ombudsmen, police, politicians (98% of whom are lawyers) and other taxpayer funded Government legal institutions that seem to have become infected with the lawyers culture – a “holier than thou” syndrome that has sheltered and even judicially and politically sanctified crime and corruption, legal nonsense and political and economic ineptitude including the wholesale abandonment of any serious pretence of human rights or rule of law for Australians.”
James has also pledged himself an active campaigner for constitutional, political and justice reforms, recognising that widespread corruption and human rights abuse are just symptoms of bigger problems that occur whenever government grows so big and so invasive of every detail of ordinary daily affairs that government leaves no room for the roles of the four other pillars of civilised society, the individual, the family, the community and the church, which as little as 3 generations ago once played significant roles in regulating and enhancing the day to day well-being of ordinary daily life.
Recognising the formidable barriers to justice that exist in a legal system that has been fully-designed, built, owned and operated by and for the ruling Australian lawyer political elite for generations, and seeking to warn and to inform wider audiences, James has turned the stories and transcripts from several important human rights cases into screen plays for theatre and cinema projects. These include James’ first three screen plays “The Crucible”, “Soylent Green and Gold” and “Seven Little Australians.”
James is currently working on his latest projects:
“Solving Debtocracy and “Lawyerocracy“ will be released in 2012.
HOW TO CONTACT JAMES
You can contact James:
All information that you send to James (including your identity and contact details) will be kept strictly confidential and private. No personal or identifying information will be disclosed or used in any way without your consent.
Please understand that all of James political actions (and any associated actions in the law courts and in the media) are funded entirely out of James’ private purse – which has been aggressively pounded by unlawful reprisal and other McCarthyist actions of the Australian lawyer-ruled government. Obviously James’ private purse is no match for the taxation and spending powers of the Australian Government and its many taxpayer-funded, lawyer-filled agencies and institutions.
Please also understand that within Australia alone, there are tens of thousands of Australian human rights victims of the Australian Government – victims of the the de-humanising and human rights abusing internal affairs and foreign affairs practises of our taxpayer-funded governmen and governwomen.
Just as the Australian Government could not afford to admit, to recognise, to apologise and to compensate the thousands of living Australian victims of Government human rights abuse (let alone the equally widespread abuses inflicted on previous generations) it is not possible for James to assist all or even many of the victims and whistleblowers who come forward to me – no matter how much James wishes he could help everybody.
James Johnson, Independent Federal Candidate for Lalor
(Published: 05/26/2011. Last Updated: 03/21/2012)
Things that have been said about James
“Political dissident, constitutional human rights lawyer, politician, playwright and activist James Johnson knows all about living with the consequences of being persecuted, being “with-outlawed,” and being oppressed by McCarthyist lawyerist-government attacks for speaking up and out against corruption within government and, especially within the hidden fourth estate, the legal profession, the 1% of the ruling class 1% that controls the government in Australia, like lawyerist- governments do in much of the Western world and the rest of the Restern world that is subjugated to Western debtocracy money supply controls – debtocracy writ globally at large through the legal and financial centres of the world.”
“Paradoxically (or perhaps, more truthfully, causatively) with more than two decades of top-tier experience of solving political-financial-legal problems for powerful multinational corporations, State and local governments, James is one of the few lawyer-trained economists, an educated commoner, who can not only speak for the 99% by articulating the dominant root causes for the undemocratic debtocratic political and economic perils facing the world today, but James can even articulate the non-violent ‘hasten slowly’ measures necessary to transcend three centuries of debtocratic world rule to create a new world order of truly independent nations of participatory democracies with genuine respect for constitutional government, human rights and rule of law – not the lipserving kind that our schizoid current debtocracy leaders of our current world governments say to us (while doing the opposite to us) with their managed democracy through their managed media and their lawyer-elite governments of the 99% by the 1% for the 1%.”
More Links
http://www.jamesjohnson2020.com
http://www.jamesjohnsonohr.weebly.com
&
http://www.twitter.com/JamesJohnsonCHR
http://barnabyisright.com/2011/07/03/meet-james-johnson-the-man-with-a-plan-to-take-out-gillard/
Pingback: - August 26, 2011
Pingback: - May 13, 2012
Pingback: - June 2, 2012
How can i contact you by email.
Posted by korrupsjon | July 5, 2011, 6:57 pmFamily law is stil in appalling condition, kids are self harming, they are imprisoned for life and handed to theri abusers………concerns raised are falling on deaf ears…….
Posted by Harrison | September 19, 2012, 10:17 amWhere are you James and what have they done to you…we havent heard?
Posted by Alicia | September 19, 2012, 10:20 amJulia Gillard is a complete disaster. If you believe you can improve on leadership governance and accountability and take a humanitarian insighted approach you should give her a run for her money.
I am unable to either follow new people or re-follow on Twitter as I have reached the limits of the standard 2000 or so following. No limits on follows, but the ratio needs to balance out.
I continue to speak out very loudly against many current Labour Party policies. I do not support the Liberals or Liberal Democratic Party or their philosophies but I can see how easy the Gillard Government is making it for them.
I would not wish to see Julia Gillard or Chris Bowen in any position of power in the future. Nor do I beleive that Kevin Rudd can deliver.
The way things are going Labour may well be enjoying its last period in Office for a long tine. It is no longer possible to distinguish between Labour and Liberal policies and philosophies. We have already returned to the evil Howard era with Pacific-like Solutions, rejection of internatoinal moral and legal obligations; and a carbon tax policiy that facilitates massive growth in the gas industry whilst deceptively projecting the package as heading for a clean energy future without regard to the science or the facts. There is a growing proportion of the population utterly disillusioned.
Regards
Madeleine Kingston
skylark100AU1 Twitter (mostly humanitarian issues
skylark100AU2 Twitter (ecology, environment, sustainability, energy and utility policy)
Posted by Madeleine Kingston | August 14, 2011, 3:38 pmDear James (Johnson)
Glad we are maintaining contact through this blog and Twitter. I appreciate your interest in my views.
You should know that as a voter I seek answers to probing questions of those in political or Government office (though rarely receive satisfactory answers); and those seeking to occupy such office.
I quote from your blog above:
***
“The current Federal Member for Lalor, Prime Minister Julia Gillard, is an authoritarianism, far-left “Labor Princess” who was implanted into the Lalor electorate by her Australian Labor Party on the 1998 retirement of former quiz-show champion Barry Jones, making Lalor one of the most neglected Federal Electorates in Australia for more than a decade.”
***
I have no difficulty accepting that Julia Gillard is authoritarian
No do I doubt the assertion that Ms Gillard’s appointment as Federal Member for Lalor has led to gross neglect of that constituency.
I would go further and suggest that Ms Gillard, despite any perceived skin-deep charms, appears to lack moral fibre; has appalling leadership skills; appears to have little regard for accountability; poor grasp of economic principles and waning popularity.
This sadly may well mean that the evil Opposition party whose principles Ms Gillard and her supporters appear to embrace despite all protests from them to the contrary.
However, given that Ms Gillard appears to be learning so far to the Right as to make a mockery of the core principles of Labour as I had once understood them, my first question to you is:
*
Q Why do you refer to La Gilliard, viz. Julia Gillard Prime Minister as a far-left “Labor Princess” (rather than far-Right)
**
If you can manage a satisfactory answer to this publicly and would also wish to discuss further offline, let me know. I have asked the same question on Twitter on @skylark100AU1.
I am also discussing unacceptable policies in relation to ecological, environmental and energy/utility policies, which are appear to be far from embracing scientific principles, accountability, due care and concern for the future of the planet and of Australia’s obligations to its own population and to the impacts on its immediate and further neighbours.
On my eco account @skylark100AU2 and elsewhere I will when time permits resume my discussions relating to my perceptions that current policies reflect the likelihood that Labour policies are “in bed with the fossil fuel industry” with blanket sanction of massive growth in the gas industry, whilst deceptively suggesting that the policies will lead to a Clean Energy Future. Nothing could be further from the truth. This is not the time to explore this further but I can substantiate my views with copious referencing and reliance on credible opinion.
By the way I am a great admirer of Julian Burnside, QC AO and of Geffrey Robertson, QC. I extensively cite the former on mandatory immigration detention issues; distortion and failure to uphold international obligations and alleged crimes against humanity of the Australian Government (at the time relating to the evil Howard era), but just as applicable now. More about this another time, but my Twitter account does cover some ground and Topsy trackbacks. @skylark100AU1 Topsy.
Regards
Madeleine Kingston
skylark100AU1 (Twitter – mostly humanitarian and human rights issues focus refugee/asylum policies; political prisoners; forced migration; genocide, abuse and the like; failure to embrace international provisions human rights)
skylark100AU2 (Twitter a/c – dedicated eco, environment, energy and utility policy. Includes impacts climate change and resulting forced migration)
PS I prefer locus of control. Twitter policies are strict about many 3rd party applications and their use, but in any case I prefer to personalize my choice or rejection of followers. I have reached the limits of allowed ratio following:follows, but prefer relevant genuine followers than bots and others for the sake of increasing numbers. There are no limits to numbers of follows, but quality over quantity, always.
Posted by Madeleine Kingston | August 15, 2011, 4:44 pmI seek honest and prompt answers to honest questions.
I am willing to go that extra mile to expose rorts and inadequate federal and state or global policies or filaures
I have no funds to donate to any cause. I have spirit integrity and morl standards that I stand by. That is all. I will not be compromised. If my position means that any part gains control notwithstanding my protests and moral stance, so be it.
However, I will not support compromise. Period.
Whilst I am willing to the right people and/or philosophies to provide ammuniation, the offier is not unconditional. I need to be quite quite what and why I am supporting anything.
A philosophy offered by the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) proferred a position purporting commitment to humanitarian principles that I challenged and ultimately publicly derided. I have disucssed this publicly and am willing to do so again. Similar positions not acceptable to me.
My moral and philosophical position is not up for compromise. I take a take it or leave it position. Too bad if those not ddelivering; not capable of delivering; will not deliver; are too far compromise; have always been compromised; are in the pockets of the the Lobbyocracy or Murdocracy.
Deliver and you might be in.
Otherwise expect to fail e.g:
a) Fail to communicate effectively and honestly;
b) Silence dissent at any level;
c) Lose moral compass; (my estimate as a voter) including the upholding of international laws such as including customary laws) More details and links to follow future inputs ( esp refugee, asylum political prisonors, genocide; unconscionable trade agreements; unconscionable regional asylum; refugee solutions such as the Pacficic Solution and similar; swap dals such as the #MalaysianSolution #NauruSolution #PNGSolution (#ManhusIslandIsolution) any future #EastTimorSolution) #ChristmasIslandSolution’ and other Regional #refugee #asylum solution, whether or note endorsed by respected academics, #UNHCR, globally respected bodies or individuals
d) Lose the plot fail to understand the basics;
e) get in bed with the fossil fuel industry (including the gas industry and its expansion; concelaed as a Carbon Tax Package or similar whether industry solution or direct action Solution)
f) Use pragmatic support options in a secondary Coaltion capacity (can explain further)
f) Adopt Anarchistic options
and you lose me as a voter or potential voter
Regards
Madeleine Kingston
Australian Voter
skylark100AU1 (Twitter – mostly humanitarian and human rights issues focus refugee/asylum policies; political prisoners; forced migration; genocide, abuse and the like; failure to embrace international provisions human rights)
skylark100AU2 (Twitter a/c – dedicated ecolosy, environment, energy and utility policy. Includes impacts climate change and resulting forced migration)
Posted by Madeleine Kingston | August 15, 2011, 10:18 pmNeith Libs nor Labor have made any efforts to protect innocent kids and parents in family courts…and have allowed professionals and judiciary rort the system……..which is a huge concern for those who care…………
Posted by Robert | August 20, 2012, 6:58 pm